AI Tools: The Concerns Over Intellectual Property and Data Privacy you should assess prior of a commercial usageAI tools could be a potential risk (and oportunity) to your organization. Learn in this article how to better assess the available solutions, balancing innovation needs and risk management.
Other articles in our blog
Today we will cover a trending topic, which is being up for several weeks: ChatGPT and its concerns over Data Privacy. In addition to that, we will instigate a conversation around other IA tools like GitHub Copilot and related concerns over Data Privacy and Intellectual Property.
This article is relevant for Software Engineers, Developers, Agilists, Project Managers, Security and IT managers.
Welcome to Macher Tecnologia’s blog.
It is unquestionable the power and use of AI tools in our current, Digital, world. Companies are required to transform their business with the help of any viable technology at hand. AI, ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot, for example, are available at our fingertips and we are required – at least – to take a look and try it out.
It is also unquestionable how compelling it is for us to pilot a project or start using them given their simple approach, how effective they seems to be and how much time they can save from our teams.
So what could be the concerns over its usage?
Data Privacy: Unfortunately, not everything is as easy as it seems to be…
As seen in the past few days, ChatGPT has been temporarily “banned” in Italy due to Privacy concerns. Regulators are concerned that personal data might have been used to train the model and populate data repositories without the required information and/or transparency levels with data subjects.
Although OpenAI said that they are committed to GDPR and other privacy laws (we presume the brazilian LGPD too), as several data sources (books, articles, websites, blogs, and posts) are scrapped and used to provide these state-of-the-art-amazing responses, it is possible that the Italian concerns might have some reasonable justifications on its roots.
The ARS Technica recent article presents a point of view to its users which shows that privacy concerns reside, for example, on:
- Modification of how (legal basis, terms, etc) a given source data was originally published / disclosed on the internet, or, on how it has been made available;
- The fact that it seems OpenAI has no disclosed procedures for data subjects to verify IF the company stores data about them, WHICH data, or, how individuals can exercise their rights is also a Data Privacy issue.
But the concerns are no limited to Data Privacy. We have Intellectual Property concerns as well.
In case you plan to incorporate such AI into a product of yours, or a large-scale process or distribution, it is important to involve your legal and privacy teams.
A few months ago, Forbes published an article from Joe Mckendrick where he shares multiple thoughts and interpretation on the ownership of the intellectual property generated by AI, or, used as the source to generate the AI end result.
As we see on the article, there is not a single or easy answer.
In the other hand, ARS Technica article points out that the AI tools may not be properly compensating the original data owner for its intellectual property usage, or that it can even bypass news articles limitations (paid subscriptions) to access contents and render results. This issue can also generate ramifications to what you are planning to do with AI. Corroborating the article, Bard, Google’s AI, was caught on a plagiarism-like situation where it took a content from the web and replied to a user if it was on its own. Later, Bard assumed what it did could be, potentially, be considered plagiarism.
How does Data Privacy and Intellectual Property matters affects developers and IT teams?
Open-source usage: A side conversation…
A recent study from Synopsys shows that:
- 54% of code bases contains licensing conflicts;
- 91% of codebases contained code that is not updated / maintained in the past 2 years;
- 11% of Java codebases contained a vulnerable version of Log4J;
- 87% had some sort of vulnerability.
Synopsys evaluated over 1700 commercial codebases, from 17 industries
Why mixing up ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot and Open Source?
Well, it is just a small-sized illustration of our current AI business scenario!
If GitHub Copilot accesses open-source data to generate code, and, it contains vulnerabilities, it is possible that the output code will also contain such issues. If GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT accesses and uses copyrighted materials, it is possible that the outcome could expose users and organizations to some level of risks. If AI source contains personal data and you end up using it in a non-anonymized form, your company could be violating data privacy laws and regulations. If AI source contains personal data illegally acquired, all subsequent usage is equally illegal.
But at the end of the day, all comes down to take informed decisions while assuming (and taking) some opportunity and risks to stay relevant in your market.
Equally important to note that we are not discouraging the usage of open-source tools or AI, but its usage has to be leveraged as any other tool, being assessed within a strategic point-of-view.
As a team member working for an organization of any size, the decision whether or not to use an AI tool, open-source code or any given solution must be bounded by some principles:
- Follow internal IT processes and procedures (e.g., Secure Software Development);
- Discussion with peers and managers;
- Map risks and mitigation approaches;
- Discuss with IT, Privacy and Legal teams;
- Even following all internal policies, be careful on what you share. Recently Samsung employees have unintentionally leaked Confidential Intellectual Property into ChatGPT. I am sure you don’t want to be in this situation!
So that at the end of the day, the risk (and/or opportunity) acceptance is done at the company level and not at an individual level. Following this approach, you not only add value to your technical consultation by protecting the company business and reputation, but also protecting yourself as an individual and professional.
As someone very wise once said, “With great power comes great responsibility”. AI is a great power… and the responsibility of an ethical usage resides in you.
Hope you enjoyed this article and that it provides good insights to you and your business.
Follow us on LinkedIn for more IT, Outsourcing and Data Privacy related contents!
If you need specialized support on Data Privacy and Web Development teams, reach ou to us! An agent will reply shortly!